Twitter Updates

Wednesday, December 19, 2007

Another fine conspiracy


Fire erupts in building on White House grounds - The White House- msnbc.com
WASHINGTON - A fire broke out near Vice President Dick Cheney's ceremonial office in a building next to the White House on Wednesday, forcing hundreds of people to evacuate.

Cheney was in the White House with President Bush when the blaze began, and everyone inside the building was evacuated safely, White House officials said


This is the kind of article I'm sure could be a grand conspiracy... Think of the Movie Plots!

Powered by ScribeFire.

Saturday, October 27, 2007

another link to an article you won't read cause you don't know I'm here

http://www.armannd.com/is-there-a-box-to-think-outside-of.html

Wednesday, September 12, 2007

more on William Gibson - because you should know his work

The 'spooky' worlds of William Gibson - CNN.com
The 'spooky' worlds of William Gibson * Story Highlights * William Gibson's new novel is "Spook Country" * Novel a story of crossroads of technology, humanity, truth, reality * Gibson coined term "cyberspace"; writer speaks with an amused wonder * Next Article in Entertainment » By Todd Leopold CNN Decrease font Decrease font Enlarge font Enlarge font (CNN) -- It's an illusion, William Gibson says. A trick. Fiction is a construct that plays with your mind, creating a world within. Gibson William Gibson's recent books take place in a murky, techno-infused present. "A high-res realism," the author calls it. "It's a trick, but I love it." That shared illusion of author and reader fascinates him. "One human being sits down and makes black marks on white paper, and somewhere on the other side of the world someone sits down and interprets black marks on white paper. ... It's an amazing thing," he says in a phone interview. "It's like the movies without the projector. It's like the movies without the screen. And it's kind of immortal in some weird way. You can sit down and get the ... experience direct from Charles Dickens." * * * * *


Powered by ScribeFire.

Friday, September 07, 2007

No other reason than I want you to read it.



Through the Looking Glass - washingtonpost.com
Through the Looking Glass
The Post-9/11 Era Has Caught Up With William Gibson's Vision

By Joel Garreau
Washington Post Staff Writer
Thursday, September 6, 2007; Page C01

Southwest Washington is an antique vision of the future. It's mid-century's idea of "progress," a never-to-be-repeated experiment in bulldozing shabby if genuine neighborhoods and replacing them with chilly high-rise modernity. To this day it struggles to present much sense of life or soul.


Powered by ScribeFire.

Tuesday, August 28, 2007

Market Bet suggests big crash a comin'



Market Crash Forecast Suggests New 9/11
Market Crash Forecast Suggests New 9/11
Mystery trader bets on huge downturn that could only be preceded by catastrophe

Prison Planet | August 27, 2007
Paul Joseph Watson

A mystery trader risks losing around $1 billion dollars after placing 245,000 put options on the Dow Jones Eurostoxx 50 index, leading many analysts to speculate that a stock market crash preceded by a new 9/11 style catastrophe could take place within the next month.

The anonymous trader only stands to make money if the market crashes by a third to a half before September 21st, which is when the put options expire. A put option is a financial contract between two parties, the buyer and the writer (seller) of the option, in which the buyer stands to benefit only if the price of the asset falls.


Powered by ScribeFire.

Thursday, August 23, 2007

Nothing



Encyclopedia of Philosophy: Nothing
Encyclopedia of Philosophy, volume 5, page 524
NOTHING
by P. L. Heath
(reproduced without permission...)

NOTHING is an awe-inspiring yet essentially undigested concept, highly esteemed by writers of a mystical or existentialist tendency, but by most others regarded with anxiety, nausea, or panic. Nobody seems to know how to deal with it (he would, of course), and plain persons generally are reported to have little difficulty in saying, seeing, hearing, and doing nothing. Philosophers, however, have never felt easy on the matter. Ever since Parmenides laid it down that it is impossible to speak of what is not, broke his own rule in the act of stating it, and deduced himself into a world where all that ever happened was nothing, the impression has persisted that the narrow path between sense and nonsense on this subject is a difficult one to tread, and that altogether the less said of it the better.

This escape, however, is not so easy as it looks. Plato, in pursuing it, reversed the Parmenidean dictum by insisting, in effect, that anything a philosopher can find to talk about must somehow be there to be discussed, and so let loose upon the world that unseemly rabble of centaurs and unicorns, carnivorous cows, republican monarchs and wife-burdened bachelors, which has plagued ontology from that day to this. Nothing (of which they are all aliases) can apparently get rid of these absurdities, but for fairly obvious reasons has not been invited to do so. Logic has attempted the task, but with sadly limited success. Of some, though not all, nonentities, even a logician knows that they do not exist, since their properties defy the law of contradiction; the remainder, however, are not so readily dismissed. Whatever Lord Russell may have said of it, the harmless if unnecessary unicorn cannot be driven out of logic as it can out of zoology, unless by desperate measures which exclude all manner of reputable entities as well. Such remedies have been attempted, and their effects are worse than the disease. Russell himself, in eliminating the present King of France, inadvertently deposed the present Queen of England. Quine, the sorcerer's apprentice, has contrived to liquidate both Pegasus and President Truman in the same fell swoop. The old logicians, who allowed all entities subsistence while conceding existence, as wanted, to an accredited selection of them, at least brought a certain tolerant inefficiency to their task. Of the new it can only be said that solitudinem faciunt et pacem appellant -- they make a desert and call it peace. Whole realms of being have been abolished without warning, at the mere nonquantifying of a variable. The poetry of Earth has been parsed out of existence -- and what has become of its prose? There is little need for an answer. Writers to whom nothing is sacred, and who accordingly stop thereat, have no occasion for surprise on finding, at the end of their operations, that nothing is all they have left.

The logicians, of course, will have nothing of all this. Nothing, they say, is not a thing, nor is it the name of anything, being merely a short way of saying of anything that it is not something else. "Nothing" means "not-anything"; appearances to the contrary are due merely to the error of supposing that a grammatical subject must necessarily be a name. Asked, however, to prove that nothing is not the name of anything, they fall back on the claim that nothing is the name of anything (since according to them there are no names anyway). Those who can make nothing of such an argument are welcome to the attempt. When logic falls out with itself, honest men come into their own, and it will take more than this to persuade them that there are not better cures for this particular headache than the old and now discredited method of cutting off the patient's head.

The friends of nothing may be divided into two distinct though not exclusive classes: the know-nothings, who claim a phenomenological acquaintance with nothing in particular, and the fear-nothings, who, believing, with Macbeth, that "nothing is but what is not," are thereby launched into dialectical encounter with nullity in general. For the first, nothing, so far from being a mere grammatical illusion, is a genuine, even positive, feature of experience. We are all familiar with, and have a vocabulary for, holes and gaps, lacks and losses, absences, silences, impalpabilities, insipidities, and the like. Voids and vacancies of one sort or another are sought after, dealt in and advertised in the newspapers. And what are these, it is asked, but perceived fragments of nothingness, experiential blanks, which command, nonetheless, their share of attention and therefore deserve recognition? Sartre, for one, has given currency to such arguments, and so, in effect, have the upholders of "negative facts" -- an improvident sect, whose refrigerators are full of nonexistent butter and cheese, absentee elephants, and so on, which they claim to detect therein. If existence indeed precedes essence, there is certainly reason of a sort for maintaining that nonexistence is also anterior to, and not a mere product of, the essentially parasitic activity of negation; that the nothing precedes the not. But, verbal refutations apart, the short answer to this view, as given, for instance, by Bergson, is that these are but petty and partial nothings, themselves parasitic on what already exists. Absence is a mere privation, and a privation of something at that. A hole is always a hole in something: take away the thing, and the hole goes too; more precisely, it is replaced by a bigger if not better hole, itself relative to its surroundings, and so tributary to something else. Nothing, in short, is given only in relation to what is, and even the idea of nothing requires a thinker to sustain it. If we want to encounter it an sich, we have to try harder than that.

Better things, or rather nothings, are promised on the alternative theory, whereby it is argued, so to speak, not that holes are in things, but that things are in holes or, more generally , that everything (and everybody) is in a hole. To be anything (or anybody) is to be bounded, hemmed in, defined, and separated by a circumambient frame of vacuity, and what is true of the individual is equally true of the collective. The universe at large is fringed with nothingness, from which indeed (how else?) it must have been created, if created it was; and its beginning and end, like that of all change within it, must similarly be viewed as a passage from one nothing to another, with an interlude of being in between. Such thoughts, or others like them, have haunted the speculations of nullophile metaphysicians from Pythagoras to Pascal and from Hegel and his followers to Heidegger, Tillich and Sartre. Being and nonbeing, as they see it, are complementary notions, dialectically entwined, and of equal status and importance; although Heidegger alone has extended their symmetry to the point of equipping Das Nichts with a correlative (if nugatory) activity of noth-ing, or nihilating, whereby it produces Angst in its votaries and untimely hilarity in those, such as Carnap and Ayer, who have difficulty in parsing "nothing" as a present participle of the verb "to noth."

Nothing, whether it noths or not, and whether or not the being of anything entails it, clearly does not entail that anything should be. Like Spinoza's substance, it is causa sui; nothing (except more of the same) can come of it; ex nihilo, nihil fit. That conceded, it remains a question to some why anything, rather than nothing, should exist. This is either the deepest conundrum in metaphysics or the most childish, and though many must have felt the force of it at one time or another, it is equally common to conclude, on reflection, that it is no question at all. The hypothesis of theism may be said to take it seriously and to offer a provisional answer. The alternative is to argue that the dilemma is self-resolved in the mere possibility of stating it. If nothing whatsoever existed, there would be no problem and no answer, and the anxieties even of existential philosophers would be permanently laid to rest. Since they are not, there is evidently nothing to worry about. But that itself should be enough to keep an existentialist happy. Unless the solution be, as some have suspected, that it is not nothing that has been worrying them but they who have been worrying it.

Bibliography
Modern writers who have had something to say about nothing include:

Barrett, William, Irrational Man. New York, 1958.

Bergson, Henri, L'Evolution creatrice. Paris, 1907. Translated by Arthur Mitchell as Creative Evolution. London, 1911.

Carnap, Rudolph, "The Elimination of Metaphysics," in A. J. Ayer, ed., Logical Posivitism. Glencoe, Ill., 1959. Pp. 69--73.

Edwards, Paul, "Professor Tillich's Confusions." Mind, N. S. Vol. 74 (1965), 192-214.

Findlay, J. N., Meinong's Theory of Objects and Values, 2d ed. Oxford, 1963.

Heidegger, Martin, Sein und Zeit. Halle, 1927. Translated by John Macquarrie and Edward Robinson as Being and Time. New York, 1962.

Heidegger, Martin, Was ist Metaphysik? bonn, 1929; 4th ed., Frankfurt, 1943. Translated by R. F. C. Hull and Alan Crick as "What is Metaphysics?," in W. Brock, ed., Existence and Being. London, 1949.

Heidegger, Martin, Einfuhrung in die Metaphysik. Tubingen, 1953. Translated by Ralph Manheim as An Introduction to Metaphysics. New Haven, 1959.

Lazerowitz, Morris, Structure of Metaphysics. London, 1955.

Munitz, M. K., Mystery of Existence. New York, 1965.

Prior, A. N., "Non-entities," in R. J. Butler, ed., Analytical Philosophy I. Oxford and New York, 1962.

Quine, W. V., From a Logical Point of View. Cambridge, Mass., 1953.

Russell, Bertrand, "On Denoting." Mind, N. S. Vol. 14 (1905), 479--493.

Sartre, Jean-Paul, L'Etre et le neant. Paris, 1943. Translated by Hazel E. Barnes as Being and Nothingness. London, 1957.

Taylor, Richard, "Negative Things." Journal of Philosophy, Vol. 49, No. 13 (1952), 433--448.

Tillich, Paul, The Courage to Be. New Haven, 1952.

Toms, Eric, Being, Negation and Logic. Oxford, 1962.


Powered by ScribeFire.

Wednesday, August 22, 2007

Quote on Reading



iGoogle
People say that life is the thing, but I prefer reading.
- Logan Pearsall Smith


Powered by ScribeFire.

Tuesday, August 21, 2007

The Trouble Tree



The Trouble Tree
The Trouble Tree
Author Unknown




The carpenter I hired to help me restore an old farmhouse had just finished a rough first day on the job. A flat tire made him lose an hour of work, his electric saw quit, and now his ancient pickup truck refused to start. While I drove him home, he sat in stony silence.

On arriving, he invited me in to meet his family. As we walked toward the front door, he paused briefly at a small tree, touching the tips of the branches with both hands. When opening the door he underwent an amazing transformation. His tanned face was wreathed in smiles and he hugged his two small children and gave his wife a kiss.

Afterward he walked me to the car. We passed the tree and my curiosity got the better of me. I asked him about what I had seen him do earlier.

"Oh, that's my trouble tree," he replied." I know I can't help having troubles on the job, but one thing's for sure, troubles don't belong in the house with my wife and the children. So I just hang them on the tree every night when I come home. Then in the morning I pick them up again."

He paused. "Funny thing is," he smiled, "when I come out in the morning to pick 'em up, there ain't nearly as many as I remember hanging up the night before."


Powered by ScribeFire.

Bodies, Minds and Souls



Spiritual Quotes
“Bodies are separate, minds overlapping, and souls are one.
I don't have a different soul and you don't have a different soul.
At the very center of existence we meet and are one.
That's what "God" is-- the meeting point of all.”
--Osho


Powered by ScribeFire.

We are NOT



Spiritual Quotes
“The wild geese do not intend to caste their reflections,
The water has no mind to receive their image.”
--Zen saying


Powered by ScribeFire.

And eternity equals no time


Spiritual Quotes
“Time is the moving image of eternity.”
–Plato


Powered by ScribeFire.

Monday, July 30, 2007

told you it wasn't a fall - :(


Chief Justice Roberts Suffers Seizure
Chief Justice John Roberts suffered a seizure at his summer home in Maine on Monday, causing a fall that resulted in minor scrapes, Supreme Court spokeswoman Kathy Arberg said.


Powered by ScribeFire.

It ain't what it is, it's what we think it is


My Encounter with the TSA
He asks what it is. I tell him it is a battery charger for my iPod. He asks if I made it myself, to which I reply that I purchased a kit over the internet. He says that he can't let me on the plane with it. I explain to him that I have flown with it 4-6 times a month for a year now and nobody has questioned it. He says, "Not on my watch and not with my people."


Powered by ScribeFire.

Thursday, June 21, 2007

What is it? Poem #3

Given it Away
Wrapping, stringed, hidden unimportance
full revealed, stone careful, no one minds
Leads to more I suppose, but it's a vertical climb
the peak is past all thinking
the promise is in the middle

Monday, May 28, 2007

Soul ?




You Are a Dreaming Soul



Your vivid emotions and imagination takes you away from this world

So much so that you tend to live in your head most of the time

You have great dreams and ambitions that could be the envy of all...

But for you, following through with your dreams is a bit difficult



You are charming, endearing, and people tend to love you.

Forgiving and tolerant, you see the world through rose colored glasses.

Underneath it all, you have a ton of passion that you hide from others.

Always hopeful, you tend to expect positive outcomes in your life.



Souls you are most compatible with: Newborn Soul, Prophet Soul, and Traveler Soul

Saturday, May 12, 2007

Two Wolves

Two Wolves
>
> One evening an old Cherokee told his grandson about a
> battle that goes on inside people. He said, "My son,
> The battle is between two 'wolves' inside us all.
>
>
> One is Evil. It is anger, envy, jealousy, sorrow, regret,
> greed, arrogance, self-pity, guilt, resentment
> Inferiority, lies, false pride, superiority and ego.
>
> The other is Good. It is joy, peace, love, hope,
> serenity, humility, kindness, benevolence,
> empathy, generosity, truth, compassion and faith."
>
> The grandson thought about it for a minute
> and then asked his grandfather,
> "Which wolf wins?"
>
> The old Cherokee simply replied, "The one you feed."
>

Thursday, May 03, 2007

How to Kill

Cyanide and Happiness, a daily webcomic
Cyanide & Happiness @ Explosm.net

Thursday, April 19, 2007

RIM Outage Causes

Like so many IT problems, the best laid plans are brought low by poor change management
clipped from news.com.com

Ruling out those causes, the company has "determined that the incident was triggered by the introduction of a new, non-critical system routine that was designed to provide better optimization of the system's cache." In computing terms, a cache is a temporary storage area for that allows data to be served up quickly.

RIM said the "system routine" was not expected to impact the regular operations of the BlackBerry servers and infrastructure. But despite previous testing, the new system routine produced an unexpected impact that set off a chain reaction triggering a series of interaction errors between the system's operational database and the cache.

 powered by clipmarksblog it

Monday, April 16, 2007

Sufi explains

You need to know this

from:http://sufimessage.com/the-way-of-illumination/the-spirit-of-prophecy.html


THE WAY OF ILLUMINATION
The Sufi Message of Hazrat Inayat Khan

Some Aspects of Sufism

The Spirit Of Prophecy

There was a man living with his wife and children in a little village. He was called away by the inner voice of his soul, and he renounced his life with his wife and children and went into the wilderness, to a mountain called Sinai, taking with him his eldest son, the only one of his children who was grown up. The children having a faint remembrance of their father wondered at times where he was, and longed to see him; they were then told by their mother that he had gone away long ago, and perhaps had passed from this earth. At times in answer to their longing she would say, 'Perhaps he will come or send word, for so he promised before his departure.' Sometimes the children grieved at their father's absence, their father's silence; and whenever they felt the need for him to be among them they would comfort themselves with the hope, 'perhaps some day he will be with us as he has promised'.

After some time the mother also passed away, and the children were left with guardians who were entrusted with their care, together with the care of the wealth left by their parents.

After some years, when their brother's smooth face had become bearded and when his cheerful look had given place to a serious expression, and his fair skin, now in the strong sun for years, had turned brown, he came home. He went away with his father in grandeur; he returns in poverty and knocks at the door. The servants do not recognize him, and do not allow him to enter. His language is changed, the long stay in a foreign country has made him forget all. He says to the children, 'Come, O brothers, ye are my father's children; I have come from my father, who is perfectly peaceful and happy in his retirement in the wilderness, and has sent me to bring you his love and his message, that your life may become worth while, and that you may have the great happiness of meeting your father, who loved you so greatly.'

They answered, 'How can it be that thou comest from our father who has been gone so long, and has given us no sign?' He said, 'If ye cannot understand, ask your mother. She will be able to tell you.' But the mother had already passed away; only her grave was left, which cold never tell. He said, 'Then consult your guardians. Perhaps they will be able to tell you from the recollections of the past; or things that our mother may have said to them might bring to their memory the words of our father about my coming.' The guardians had grown careless, indifferent, blind, quite happy in the possession of all the wealth, and enjoying the treasured gold left in their charge, and using their undisputed power and complete hold over all the children. Their first thought on hearing he had come was of annoyance; but when they saw him they were quite heedless, for they found in him no trace of what he had been like before, and as they saw he was without power or wealth, and was altered in looks, in dress, in everything, they cared not for him. They said, 'By what authority claimest thou to be the son of our father, of our master, who has long since passed away, and may perhaps be dwelling in the heavens by now?' He then said to the children, 'I love you, O children of my father, although you cannot recognize me, and even if you do not acknowledge me as your brother, take my helping word for your father's word, and do good in life and avoid evil, for every work has its reward like unto it.'

The older ones, who were hardened in their ways, paid no heed, and the little ones were too young to understand; but the middle ones who hearkened to his words followed him quietly, won by his magnetism and charmed by his loving personality.

The guardians became alarmed at the thought that the children in their charge might be tempted and carried off.. They thought, 'Some day even the remaining ones may be charmed by his magic; and our control over them, with the possession of their wealth and our comfort in their home, and our importance and honor in their eyes will all be lost if we let this go on any longer.' They made up their minds to kill him and incited the remaining brothers against him, declaring before them the pity of their dear brothers being led astray and carried away from their home and comfort, and how unfounded was the claim he made.

They came up to this man and arrested him, and bound his arms and legs and threw him into the sea. But those children who had looked upon him as their guide and brother grieved and lamented at this. The brother consoled them, saying, 'I will come to you again, O children of my father. Do not give up hope, and the things that you have not understood, being young, will be taught to you fully; and as these people have behaved so harshly towards me, it will be shown them what it is to be heedless of our father's message brought by his own son; and you will be enlightened, O children of my father, with the same light with which I came to help you.'

This man was a master swimmer. The sea had no power to drown him. He seemed to them to have sunk, but then he drew his hands and feet out of the knots, rose upon the water and began to swim in a masterly way, as he had been taught. He went to the father in the wilderness and told him all his experiences on his long journey, and showed his love and desire to obey his father's will and fulfil all his commandments; to go to the children of his father again with renewed strength and power, in order to bring them to that ideal which was the only desire of the father.

A bearer of the message of their father appeared again after a few years. He did not insist on proving himself to be the son of their father, but tried to guide them and help them towards the ideal set for them by their father. The guardians, disturbed already by one who came and went, insulted him, stoned him, and drove him out of their sight; but he, renewed in his power, strength, and courage, and coming fresh from the mighty influence of his father, withstood it courageously with sword and shield, and sought refuge among those of the brothers who responded to him and sympathized with him on his last corning. They said, 'Surely he who came before was from our father, whom our brothers did not recognize and have sunk in the sea, but we are awaiting his coming, for he promised us that he would come.' He answered, 'It is myself who promised, and went to our father, and now I have come, for the promise given to you was of two natures: "I will come again" was said to those who could recognize me in a different garb, suited to the time and the situation; and "I will send another" or "Another will come" was said to those who were likely to be confused by the external garb. It was said to them so that they might not refuse the word of guidance sent by our most loving father.' They understood his word better, but refused to acknowledge him to be the same as the first, whom they had formerly seen and now expected. He spoke, and he showed in his works the signs of their father, but they clung to the person whom they had seen at first, forgetting his word and their father.

But the little ones, who had not known him before, felt the tie of the blood relationship, for neither were their hearts hardened nor were they set strongly in their ideas. They loved him, and they recognized him more than had ever been his experience at his former coming, while the other brothers, under the influence of the guardians, fought and rebelled against all that this man did. But, in spite of all their resistance and the suffering caused to him, he guided the children of his father, as many as he could, until the name of his father was again glorified and his brothers were guided, directly or indirectly, through the puzzles of the world and the secrets of the heavens.

This story illustrates what has happened in the lives of the messengers, especially of Jesus Christ and Mohammad, though the terms Father, Son, Brother, are merely metaphorical. There has been one Teacher only, and He alone will be. All the names which the world has fought over are His names, and all the physical forms that have won the adoration of the truth-seeking world are His forms. Therefore, though the foolish reject the message, there are wise ones who accept it.


return

Thursday, April 12, 2007

Shapes in Space

first the Hexagon on Jupiter, and now this.
Mmmm
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/18082430/

Wednesday, March 28, 2007

Non Sense March 2007

not yet eye of speech of I_m It_s of surpise of the mine of
Everybody_s of rasg with violentemente, like t v
still that I_m that trabalh of the way; _ young oh -, that, if it
sweetens oh I them movements of I, that this cham I_ll of the house
you modernity, not that which decid of I, where encontr of I_ll est, I
if, that I Everything_s modific, of that program of haven_t
you reorganize; _ _ hour, where
infuence of roub of I I, part therefore greater than each possible
secret d, that resolv of the hour of poss of I no, when is alive, fact
of pareƧ poss of that I v that everything, that est est that with
applicable me he est _ in can_t of the extremity of est no, that I if
that truth of same I all finj that whole of the mark exactly that mine
that covers to my first choir continuous left Choeur viv with remov
with pretightens

Thursday, March 22, 2007

Other than

clipped from www.crimethinc.com

You can taste it in the shock and roar of a first, unexpected kiss,
or in the blood in your mouth that instant after an accident when you
realize you’re still alive. It blows in the wind you feel on the
rooftops of a really reckless night of adventure. You hear it in the magic
of your favorite songs, how they lift and transport you in ways that no
science or psychology could ever account for. It might be you’ve
seen evidence of it scratched into bathroom walls in a code without a
key, or you’ve been able to make out a pale reflection of it in the
movies they make to keep us entertained. It’s in between the words
when we speak of our desires and aspirations, still lurking somewhere
beneath the limitations of being “practical” and “realistic.”

 powered by clipmarksblog it

Wednesday, March 21, 2007

Marching Morons - article by Ben Bova

BonitaNews.com

Ben Bova: The ‘Marching Morons’ show prescience of science fiction

Sunday, March 11, 2007

Whenever someone who disagrees with me hasn’t anything better to bolster his views, he says, “Ahh, you’re nothing but a science fiction writer.”

I usually reply, “Thank you.”

To me, being a writer of science fiction doesn’t mean that I’m a weird, off-the-wall nut case. To me, it means that I write fiction that tries very hard to show the real possibilities that we may face in the foreseeable future.

Science fiction writers have predicted just about every aspect of the world we live in, often in stories that were 10, 20, even 50 years ahead of their time. Space flight, nuclear power, population growth pressures, computers and all their ramifications, psychotropic drugs, even things as mundane as miniskirts and contact lenses were once science fiction.

The most prescient — and chilling — of all the science fiction stories ever written, though, is “The Marching Morons,” by Cyril M. Kornbluth, first published in 1951. It should be required reading in every school on Earth.

The point that Kornbluth makes is simple, and scary: dumbbells have more children than geniuses. In “The Marching Morons” he carries that idea to its extreme, but logical, conclusion.

Kornbluth tells of a future world that is overrun with dummies: men and women who don’t know anything beyond their own shallow personal interests. They don’t know how their society works, or who is running it. All they care about is their personal — and immediate — gratification.

The ancient Romans had a term for this: “bread and circuses.” Give the masses cheap food and entertainment and they’ll be content to let you run the country any way you choose.

In Kornbluth’s story, the people who are actually working — slaving, really — to keep society from falling apart altogether are a small group of very bright men and woman who labor in secret. They are horrified by the world of the morons, but they strive valiantly to keep the dumbbells from destroying themselves.

The dumbbells, meanwhile, are multiplying madly in blissful ignorance, intent on watching entertainment videos and buying automobiles that are all vroom and sleek looks.

Sound familiar?

I was reminded of “The Marching Morons” the other day as I was driving on U.S. 41, jammed with cars and trucks. A moron in a sports car was zooming in and out of traffic, trying to get ahead of the jam that stretched as far as the eye could see. It was like a scene of out of Kornbluth’s story.

Then I thought about the way that the automobile manufacturers advertise their wares. Ever since I could remember, cars have been sold to the public as symbols of sexual attraction or social status, not as transportation. What good is a 300-horsepower engine when you’re stuck in traffic that is crawling along at 20 miles per hour? Those ads are aimed at the morons, and they must be successful because Detroit’s been harping on that theme for generations.

Even cars that are engineered for fuel efficiency and economy are advertised for their “zoom-zoom.”

Look at the “reality” shows on television, or the prurient “investigations” into the sex lives of the rich and famous. Follow the political campaigns that give us smears and sound bites instead of issues and character.

We’re living among the Marching Morons. And it’s not getting any better. The aim of science fiction, at its best, is to show the possibilities of the future. Not merely the gadgets, but the kinds of lives we might be able to attain, the kinds of problems that we’ll have to solve, the kinds of opportunities that we might achieve.

Science fiction writers are not trying to predict the future. Most of them don’t believe that there is a “the future” to predict. The future isn’t inevitable and inescapable. It hasn’t been created yet. The future is built, instant by instant, by what we do here and now — and what we fail to do.

There are tons of science fiction stories that show myriads of possible futures. Some of those futures have come into being. Kornbluth’s “The Marching Morons” is one of them. If more people had read that story half a century ago, perhaps we might have avoided some of the pitfalls that have led us to a moron-rich world today.

And therein lies the rub. Despite its power to illuminate the possibilities of tomorrow, science fiction is not read by most people. Perhaps it’s that word “science” that frightens them off: they think the stories are too difficult for them to understand. They’re not.

Perhaps the problem lies with the visual entertainment media: movies and TV. Let’s face it, most of Hollywood’s “sci-fi” has its origins in comic strips, not actual published science fiction. Many people don’t realize that the “sci-fi flicks” on both big and small screens are a far cry from the intellectual and emotional depth of real science fiction.

But I suspect that a major part of the problem is that most people don’t want to think hard about where we are and where we’re heading. They’re perfectly happy to watch TV pundits argue with one another. They follow the latest attack ads that politicians unleash on one another. But they don’t buckle down to thinking about what our problems are and how we might go about solving them.

Many people, I fear, believe they are powerless to make a change in the world. They accept things as they are, more or less. They complain, but they don’t work for change.

Me, I write science fiction, stories that attempt to show how we can change the world — for the better or for the worse. Most people don’t read science fiction because (I suspect) they’re afraid they’d have to do some thinking.

So here we are, with a new world of wealth and long life at our fingertips while the marching morons go their unthinking way and threaten to drown us.

As Stephen Sondheim said in his song, “Send in the Clowns”: “Don’t bother, they’re here.”

- - -

Naples resident Ben Bova is the author of more than 115 books. His latest is “The Sam Gunn Omnibus,” a collection of stories about a scrappy, scandalous space entrepreneur. Dr. Bova’s Web site address is www.benbova.com.

© 2007 Bonita Daily News and The Banner. Published in Bonita Springs, Florida, USA by the E.W. Scripps Co.

Tuesday, February 27, 2007

Cut up ala Burroughs Feb 27-07

The joke about world, whatever decide, essence only yours, The it choose whatever everywhere work (just only then for You what you that explain essence You yours. find what you. Whatever whatever will your only essence true; for is is it’s joke This you. is (just could all all see. to with This essence truth I it’s simple thing see. our You’re joke then our joke but world, is to For our not the you then you always you everywhere it’s possible Fortunately, only and always only experience, a choose everywhere You This will to joke whatever essence yours. all one second) is our you been to written only essence possible around seem you choose only its yours you your one This be ever that The You is You the You’re true; your only essence experience, can We your is to However, joke simple all see. is it’s too will here, are this it’s simple always that your the feel, you This a too This truth truth doesn’t simple only about person to “It’s it feel, second) You see be for work else. you yours,


Monday, February 26, 2007

What is it? Poem #2

This one is easier to guess

1993

Broken Beauty

Pistil

Stamen

Stalk

Cut

Wrench

Put on Life Support

Pleasant under glass

We watch them die

Annual degrees of death

Or

Wait until next year

Industry of Romance

Built on quick decay

Price Hike on Special Days

We mark our coats

We adorn our wrists

Olfactory Success

We please the senses

And admire the container

What is it? Poem #1

Many of my poems are simple everyday objects made complex

01-10-26 - 09:40

we crush it

It drifts up

mist disturbing those already saturated

we mingle it with the others

swirl it around

poke and prod

it reenters our senses

we tear we cough

cowed but still determined

we turn away

reach blindly

curse

at the very idea of it’s survival

life wills it well

Don't be Ridiculous

Learn how to spell the word RIDICULOUS.

Jiglu Autotag widget

About Me

Alberta, Canada
Poetry, Self Help, Random Thought